
|
Roton: An Orbital Helicopter
by Gary C. Hudson
n experienced business and engineering team proposes to build a
reusable orbital helicopter which can carry people and light cargo to
space for a fraction of the cost of conventional rocket vehicles. This
patentable vehicle concept is called Roton. It can be operated from
almost anywhere without a launch site or ground support equipment.
The development cost of Roton is modest compared with other launch
systems. This is due to three important advantages of the Roton
system. First, the vehicle is reusable and inherently reliable due to
the configuration. Even during most failures the Roton will be
recoverable intact. Second, the vehicle is small and uses
off-the-shelf equipment and cheap propellants. Third, the development
can be conducted by a small team of less than a dozen skilled
designers and technicians, making extensive use of subcontractors.
Roton was invented by Bevin McKinney, commercial space entrepreneur
and Chief Designer of American Rocket Company. McKinney, who has
spent fifteen years working in the field of low-cost rocketry,
conceived the basic Roton idea. McKinney pioneered the development of
hybrid rocket motor, firing hundreds of such devices during the 1980s,
and flew the first commercially-funded rocket, the Dolphin. He is
joined by another commercial space businessman, Gary C. Hudson.
Hudson is known principally for his work on single-stage-to-orbit
reusable spaceships, which has found expression in the $70 million
DC-X SSTO program funded by the US Government, and for which he was
awarded an Aviation Week "Laurel" in 1994.
Roton combines previously developed technologies into a unique new
concept for a space transport machine. As early as the late 1940s,
rocket engines were built which used the centrifugal pumping power of
a rotary arrangement to provide the energy to force propellants into
the combustion chamber. The "cyclo-rocket" developed at Aerojet in
1946 was the first to employ this approach, though it failed to take
the next logical step and use the actual centrifugal forces produced
by spinning the rocket around in a circle to provide direct pumping
power; rather it converted the rotary engine motion into shaft power
to run a centrifugal pump. (Hero's steam engine is a simple
expression of one element of this concept.) By positioning rocket
engines at the tip of a rotating blade or propeller, the energy
produced by the engine thrust can be made to spin the blade and to
provide the desired pumping power. While in the sensible atmosphere,
the rotor can also generate efficient thrust, often improving the
rocket engine thrust by a factor of ten. This has the result of
reducing the propellant consumption by the same factor. By combining
this technique with the very high pressure being produced by the
rotary action, engine efficiency can reach to the near ultimate
available for liquid fuel rocket systems. This permits a vehicle to
be built using inexpensive propellants (liquid oxygen and aviation
kerosene) and with a loaded to empty weight ratio of better than 15 to
1. We believe this to be within the state of the art to
manufacture.
The rotor serves an additional important function during re-entry.
By acting as a combination rotary wing and large drag brake (depending
on orientation of the blades), the rotor can either slow the vehicle
high in the atmosphere (reducing frictional heating) or extend the
crossrange and downrange glide capability of the vehicle, improving
landing performance and decreasing the decelerative loads on cargo and
crew. Re-entry performance superior than the winged Space Shuttle is
predicted to be possible.
Roton vehicles would be able to takeoff from any level ground--for
example the taxiway of a small county airport. No rocket blast
touches the surface, eliminating the need for any sort of launch
support equipment. Only kerosene and liquid oxygen, both common
industrial chemicals, need be supplied to the vehicle. A small Roton,
capable of carrying one person, will require only a few thousand
dollars worth of propellant. While noise would be substantially
greater than a small aircraft, the noise footprint is very compact and
the high speed departure from the field would minimize the impact on
the surrounding site. Upon landing, the much lighter vehicle would be
significantly quieter, comparable to a conventional helicopter.
For further discussion, please contact Gary C. Hudson
gchudson@aol.com
|